Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongolian Australians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ultimately the arguments raised for deletion vs redirection are stronger - this article describes a group of people so anyone searching for it would probably not be searching for relations on a national level. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mongolian Australians[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. there is no inherent notability of ethnic groups in a country articles. the Mongolian community represents 0.005% of Australia's population . one of the sources provided looks totally unreliable. LibStar (talk) 06:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:32, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No reason to have this as an article, as it has basically no useful information. Elliot321 (talk) 21:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Australia–Mongolia relations. Plausible search term. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 14:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Australia–Mongolia relations per Ivar. This content is largely already there, and I agree that this isn't a particularly large or otherwise noteworthy population group. Nick-D (talk) 05:48, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- This is about an expatriate group, where as relations articles are normally about diplomatic relations. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

that's a good point. LibStar (talk) 02:48, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no inherent notability for a group based on ethnic origin. A redirect to Australia–Mongolia relations would be off-topic, as this is about a group of residents, not about the diplomatic relations between the two countries. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:18, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 15:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 18:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:GNG. A small group who have not been the subject of significant coverage. If we want to note their population size somewhere, then Mongolian diaspora and Asian Australians could appropriately report the 1,235 figure. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.