Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monaken Lodge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monaken Lodge[edit]

Non-notable lodge. First person narrative. Corvus cornix_talk 03:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only news hits are about people involved, not the Lodge itself. Travellingcari (talk) 04:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep award winning group (now Cited). I tend to think Boy Scouts would find it notable. I also think it should be allowed to be around for more than 1 minute before being AfD'd. POV is an edit issue, not a reason for deletion. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 06:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 22:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:ORG. We have Order of the Arrow, but we don't even have articles on scouting units below the national level, e.g. Scouting in the United States. As to the claim of notability, the awards it has won are not independent of scouting. --Dhartung | Talk 22:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you saying that WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNOTEXIST, so this shouldn't ? The medal not independant of scouting mention is intresting, should we also not mention the VC in relation to any soilders? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Exit2DOS2000 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Dhartung. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 23:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, of extremely local interest only. There is the whole rest of the Internet to post stuff like this on, you know... Blast Ulna (talk) 12:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.