Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monagheseh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:54, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monagheseh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability, so WP:ENN applies. MSJapan (talk) 00:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nothing in the article even attempts to assert notability that would meet WP:GNG, and I didn't find anything else online. It's just barely past the WP:A7 threshold. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, googling مناقصه+روزنامه gives quite a lot of results. The newspaper website http://monaghesatiran.ir/ and http://www.jaaar.com/archive/monaghese indicates that it is a professional publication. http://www.magiran.com/maginfo.asp?mgID=5405 indicates that it is a weekly newspaper. --Soman (talk) 04:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - That still doesn't assert notability. Because it exists isn't good enough, especially when the topic isn't even accessible to a non-Farsi typer and reader. Let's be honest: what use is a local (even big city) real estate newspaper to a general reader who probably isn't there, and let's extend that to what use is an article about said paper to a general reader? MSJapan (talk) 19:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This newspaper, while it exists, doesn't seem to be notable. It was established in 2004 and changed its website 3 times after that. From what I managed to understand, it publishes a list of tenders every week. There is no claim of significance here and this is almost A7 territory. Following Wikipedia:Notability (media)#Newspapers, magazines and journals for guidance, I do not see any reason that this is notable. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An online search gave no evidence of notability. Aust331 (talk) 11:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.