Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mona Ainah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nawal Al Zoghbi. I have IAR'd on this one a bit. It's unclear whether it's a copyvio, but it doesn't contain any sources whatsoever so I have redirected back to the artist's article per WP:MUSIC Black Kite (talk) 10:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mona Ainah[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I suspect that this is a copyright violation. As a Wikipedia article, the text looks a bit messy: it looks as if someone has taken a short portion of a text out of its context. I found that the beginning of the article appears here as part of a much longer text, but the last sentence is not there. In the longer text, I think that the text fits much better to the context, so I suspect that our article is a copyright violation of that website. However, the Waybackmachine suggests that we started hosting the text before the other website started hosting this text. Stefan2 (talk) 13:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:27, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, here is the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6fhgv-GT58 , seems like quite a major production. Googling [1] gives some 16,100 hits. --Soman (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not about whether the article is notable but whether it is a copyright violation. If the article is a copyright violation but still notable, then we would have to delete the current article, but without restrictions on writing a new article on the same subject. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.