Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonaBar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MonaBar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally created as a puff piece, after culling promo all we're left with is one promotional sentence and a single link to a mention in a listicle. Searching google news gives exactly 0 hits and other searches turn up no coverage - also searched under their new name Spreever and same thing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, on the basis of the one article that mentions it (only 3 lines) around the time of its release, it doesn't seem to have been noticed much. I can't find anything else independent and reliable online. Sionk (talk) 20:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Same concerns as nom. I erroneously CSD'd it but this is perhaps a better arena for its discussion. I went through a few cashback sites, expectedly quite a few had promo and coi issues, but this was the only one that was considerably below notability. The earlier incarnation of this prior to my pruning/removing of promotional content can be seen here, you can see even in that form it is still below WP:NCORP or even a generous application of WP:GNG. Rayman60 (talk) 21:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.