Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly O'Hara
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of River City characters. Courcelles (talk) 04:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Molly O'Hara[edit]
- Molly O'Hara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters. Neelix (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of characters in River City#Present. I agree with the nominator that this fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters and the general notability guideline, but this would be a suitable redirect and page history should be preserved. Claritas § 16:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Along with the original reason for the nomination, this character is not listed on the BBC One Scotland page for the show. Other characters on the List of characters in River City#Present that are not listed and should be lumped in with this nomination are Bob O'Hara, Stella Walker, Murray Crozier. Movementarian (Talk) 16:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of River City characters. Inniverse (talk) 23:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect for its lack of sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 05:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.