Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mollie Dent-Brocklehurst

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominee‎. (non-admin closure) Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 11:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mollie Dent-Brocklehurst

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Refs are woeful, breathless interviews, PR and profiles. scope_creep^Talk 13:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Arts, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I attempted to expand the article, but coverage is often announcement-based, and without a substantial focus on her role. There is some coverage of her, both because she lived in a castle and because she has an art-related career. Beccaynr (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Morning @Beccaynr: She seems to be notable but its more than the fact that she lives in a giant castle. scope_creep^Talk 06:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi scope_creep, yes, and I continued to work on the article, so I favor keep because her WP:BASIC notability seems supported. I was able to source her current role in the art world, as well as additional reviews and coverage of her art-related career, and I think there are likely offline sources available about her art-related career in the 1990s and 2000s. I was concerned about whether we could write a reasonably balanced article; Dent-Brocklehurst clearly has an established presence in the art world as a curator/director/etc, and then there is her background, which I understand from the less-sensationalized coverage almost as another form of curation, which is related to her ownership interest in the castle. Beccaynr (talk) 15:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY/BASIC with this Telegraph profile and other significant coverage such as in the Robb Report. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 16:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think she is notable as well. I had a another look this afternoon;the work you've done Beccaynr , which is excellent as usual definently puts it across the line. Its defintely there now. Nomination Withdrawn

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.