Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molecules of Motion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This has been relisted twice which gave an editor 3 weeks to locate some sources. They were not forthcoming so I'm closing this discussion as Delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Molecules of Motion

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I initially WP:PRODed this article with the following rationale: "A film that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Neither of the external links are valid sources, and searches, using both the "Molecules of Motion" and "Molecules in Motion" names turned up no coverage or reviews in reliable sources." The PROD was contested by the article creator, with the statement that further sources would be added to establish notability, however a month later there are no changes. Just to reiterate, I, myself, was unable to find any kind of significant coverage or reviews on the film in reliable sources upon my own searches. Rorshacma (talk) 20:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 20:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think you were right about the PROD. This is not notable.

Jonchache (talk) 23:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sorry that this one fell through the cracks. Yes, I realize that it has been a month, but I am currently a one-man team at work so Wikipedia editing is on the backburner at the moment. There are several notable professional skaters (all of which have wikipedia entries) that are featured in this video. All I ask is to give me time to edit this page instead of being so trigger happy on finding pages to remove. Jasonstru (talk) 02:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find reliable, independent sources and add them then perhaps this won't be deleted. But, just because some skaters that have entries on Wikipedia does not mean this film is notable as notability is not inherited. So, since I could find nothing to support the notability of this film I will also vote Delete DonaldD23 talk to me 02:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This brief description clearly is not WP:SIGCOV and my search could not find articles demonstrating that WP:GNG or WP:NFILM is met. The keep comment is inaccurate as notability is nor inherited. VickKiang (talk) 20:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist111 (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are no good sources to be found. BruceThomson (talk) 05:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.