Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moke Hill (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 12:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moke Hill (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. Proximity to a controversy involving a notable person or company doesn't confer notability; the cited sources are covering the controversy, not Moke Hill, with only a brief mention of either the band or any of its personnel if they mention them at all. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 21:56, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The CEO of the company in the middle of the controversy chose to publish a statement from the band during the height of the controversy, and multiple media outlets are quoting a member of the band in their coverage. The second linked reference to the band/controversy also only mentions Bono, Jason Aldean and Aloe Blacc for a line or two (with Berry's statement getting a full paragraph).

Spotify also tweeted a link to the band to it's million followers during the height of the controversy ("A big thanks to @mokehillband! Read why they stay pro-Spotify and stream their hit, "Detroit" http://spoti.fi/1464fjX http://spoti.fi/1tVJgbN). The drummer of the band is also a member of a different "notable" band (Haim). Isn't wikipedia meant to be a place that people can find background on people/topics/bands in the news?

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with Nom. Controversy barely brushed by Moke Hill and does nothing for notability. Only leaves a couple of mentions about the band. Bgwhite (talk) 06:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Delete Non notable band. No references found that can make this band notable.Shashanksinghvi334 (talk) 03:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.