Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moira Anderson Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sandra Brown (campaigner). Shimeru (talk) 23:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moira Anderson Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced stub since May 2008. That's long enough to fix it if anyone cared, I think. Guy (Help!) 13:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —AllyD (talk) 13:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment BBC News story here regarding an OBE awarded to the organisation's founder. She was also the Glasgow Evening Times "Scotswoman of the Year" in 2005: [1]AllyD (talk) 13:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article now has 3rd party references. AllyD (talk) 13:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge to Sandra Brown (campaigner). Notability is the issue, not how long the article has been here. Coverage exists, but a lot of it is more about Brown: [2], [3], [4], [5]. Little detailed coverage of the foundation found. A section in the Sandra Brown article (this already exists) may be the best approach.--Michig (talk) 13:56, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge to Sandra Brown (campaigner). 3rd party references show a directory link (ref #1) - not a reliable source and a BBC article (ref #2) on Brown. For WP:ORG, the organization itself must be notable, not just mentioned in passing in a story about the founder. (GregJackP (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Sandra Brown (campaigner). I can't find any coverage that is neither a directory listing nor about its founder (who most certainly does meet notability), and I can't see any scope to expand this beyond the current stub. Should someone find more encyclopaedic information to put into the article, then there might be a case for a stand-alone article. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver seren^C 07:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver seren^C 07:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I found some other sources that dealt more firmly with the organization rather than the organizer. I think there's enough here for the article to be notable apart from Sandra Brown. Silver seren^C 07:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. The sources don't amount to significant coverage in reliable sources. With that bar not crossed, there is not enough here to support a verified article. Merge what can be verified to Sandra Brown (campaigner). --Mkativerata (talk) 23:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.