Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsin Nawaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 09:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsin Nawaz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:Actor. cited sources are not reliable enough. Saqib (talk) 09:44, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Mohsin Nawaz is a notable personality of Pakistan and i am personally a admirer of him. People idealize him and he is a source of inspiration for us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MajidaKhanum (talk • contribs) 10:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

— MajidaKhanum (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Too many SPA's involved with this bio, suspected socks needs to be investigated. User:Fdeeba, User:Haroon Christy, User:MajidaKhanum, User:Drshaziarehman. --Saqib (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think the claims of sockpuppetry should be withdrawn as this isn't the proper venue to make unsubstantiated claims. As for the article, the sources are too weak and there isn't enough to demonstrate the individual passes WP:GNG. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia's notability standards for radio broadcasters do not include "MajidaKhanum is an admirer", but require reliable source coverage about the broadcaster in media independent of his own self-published web presence. None of the sources here are satisfying what's required, however — right across the board, the referencing here is to YouTube videos, Facebook, "staff" profiles on the websites of companies or organizations with which he's directly affiliated, user-generated "open platforms for sharing viral content", and on and so forth. Exactly zero of the sources shown here even begin to approach what's required — and whether he's your hero or not, this is still not the kind of sourcing it takes to make him eligible for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 02:19, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.