Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsen Milani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsen Milani[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP article with no sources. Prod notice was applied for lack of sources back in December 2016, and removed by SPA account User talk:Trijeets who is the man himself. Two external links, mention man by name, provide no other information. scope_creep (talk) 22:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak Keep.~~ STRONG KEEP. While I'm definitely not a fan of using the project for self-promotion, as User talk:Trijeets, clearly has, if he is the subject, the fact remains that a cursory Google search identified the subject on several sites. Perhaps, rather than removing it, we just slap it with an unsourced tag. Or, just list it as an unsourced stub. X4n6 (talk) 08:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the sources to support a Weak Keep. scope_creep (talk) 11:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't you do at least a cursory Google search before nominating? Or did you just nominate based on no sources in the BLP? Because if you had, you would have seen: here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and many more that I could include. So much so in fact, that after this review, I'm changing my vote to STRONG KEEP. Subject easily passes WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and even WP:SCHOLAR and WP:AUTHOR. X4n6 (talk) 00:28, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator scope_creep (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.