Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohith agadi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mohith agadi[edit]

This person may not be notable enough for an encyclopedia. The final sentence of the article indicates that the article may contain an element of hoaxery or jokery. Richard Cavell (talk) 11:36, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First of all know about the great, intelligent boy mr.Agadi Mohith before deleting the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Naga.naga2009 (talk • contribs) 11:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The name gets a total of 10 Google hits. Sorry. --Ouro (blah blah) 15:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Perhaps even qualifies for A7. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 18:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello, on my research about agadi mohith, i found that he is an teenage boy who achieved a lot in IT field.

Regards, Somanath reddy

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete quickly please. Maybe A7 is good--the sooner the better. Drmies (talk) 02:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The "official blog" of his company more or less says it all. Zetawoof_(ζ) 07:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.