Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohanalakshmi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohanalakshmi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A wholly promotional article, likely created by a CoI editor. No indication of notability. Merely setting up a successful business doesn't confer automatic notability. Citations included have just passing mention of the subject, moreover, these are mostly sponsored content. Fails WP:GNG, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV RationalPuff (talk) 16:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 16:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 16:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 16:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 16:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable businesswoman. Only passing mentions or puff pieces provided as references and nothing better found in a WP:BEFORE. Most of the references are about her company which I believe would not pass WP:NCORP if it had an article, so I don't believe she merits any automatic inherited notability as well. Jupitus Smart 02:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough coverage in RS about her. --hroest 13:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, no reliable news coverage available to pass GNG. Rickshaw Takahashi (talk) 16:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The subject seems to have been covered in multiple news publications, which come across as reliable and unbiased (non-editorial pieces on national newspapers like The Hindu, The New Indian Express, Deccan Chronicle, India Today, BCC News, etc). Also, the subject's work has been absorbed into the curriculum by the Ministry of Education, Singapore. Hence, the notability criteria seems pretty strong to me, which is why this page was created based on personal research on the subject. When small-time entertainers and artists can be assessed as notable, why do we consider business achievers (who are inspiration to thousands of kids) as not notable? If the community still feels that the page needs to be deleted, then so be it. --Chakra14 (talk) 11:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Notability and Nobility are different things. Wikipedia is not interested in your 'noble cause'. A criminal could have wiki page while a Samaritan may not have one. Please list out which news article talks about the 'subject' and why you consider these 'significant coverage'? Passing mention in reliable sources, news about the company, patrons, balance sheet do not count. RationalPuff (talk) 13:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak move to Kidspreneur, the coverage of which in Deccan Chronicle and India Today seems to indicate notability. Furius (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.