Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Nawaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Nawaz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCRIC. bojo | talk 20:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Doesn't seems to pass WP:NCRIC. --Saqib (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the player represented Kuwait in its initial developing stages at the highest level cricket Kuwait could play at that time, Kuwait was only an affiliate and played in the ACC trophies. The player also was the first to score an international century for Kuwait, in Pakistan against RDCA. YamDeeYoumar (talk) 21:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

— YamDeeYoumar (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Delete Per nom. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ as prior 2005, Kuwait was only an affiliate, and ACC trophy was the highest level of international representation for the Kuwaiti national squad. Said player participated and has significant scores in ACC trophies 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2006 with references in the article to further strengthen this point. YamDeeYoumar (talk) 05:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

striked repeated vote. --Saqib (talk) 15:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.