Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Motasin Ali Lodi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As for the articles listed later in the discussion, this discussion would not be adequate to develop a consensus to delete those. But it may well be appropriate to start an AfD for them. Rlendog (talk) 03:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Motasin Ali Lodi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Creator of this page has removed the Speedy deletion tag from this article. And there are no references for this biography article. —AssassiN's Creed^(talk) 05:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The CSD should not have been removed. No sources cited whatsoever, possibly a cruft article.Whiteguru (talk) 12:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep at least for now. (Changing to Delete because no reliable sources have been produced.) I removed the autobiography tag placed by AssassiN's Creed as the subject died in 1948 so the article is not an autobiography. This is a stub about an early 20th century Moslem leader in what is now Pakistan. It is not "cruft", which by the way is not a valid argument for deletion. Reliable sources may well exist in other versions of a name which has been transliterated from another language. I will support deletion if an editor with the appropriate language skills verifies that the person is not notable. Cullen328 (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is salvageable only with refs and a rewrite. And being crufty is a valid reason for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 15:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep for now--this is a really poorly written article, but it might be a notable topic. Why not give it a few months on cleanup--it may improve? Meelar (talk) 22:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per Meelar too. The article was just created yesterday, and the new corner should get a chance to improve it and correct our concerns, IMO. ~ AdvertAdam^talk 05:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC) ~ AdvertAdam^talk 20:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment. The AFD tag was improperly removed from this article twice. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: If this article gets deleted, now or in the the future, the following articles should automatically go with it: Centre Mathiura Government Model Primary School, and Taleb Mohammed Lodi Jame Mosjid. ~ AdvertAdam^talk 20:56, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The main "source" cited in this article is a map, although it remains unclear to me how a map can be a source for a biography. There are also some vague citations to archives, although with no indication of what documents within the archives are being referenced. I don't see it as likely that this article is going to be properly sourced any time soon. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Massive delete the newly added group of articles (this one, Centre Mathiura Government Model Primary School, and Taleb Mohammed Lodi Jame Mosjid), no-one is willing to contribute or bring a single source. ~ AdvertAdam^talk 20:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete - no refs William M. Connolley (talk) 19:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.