Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Fouad
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. North America1000 02:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Mohammad Fouad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
My searches have found nothing noticeably better and the other two Wikis offer nothing else better. I'm willing to reconsider if substantially better can be found. SwisterTwister talk 07:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 23. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 01:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 01:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notalbe Egyptian entertainer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep has a large body of work, enough to pass WP:NACTOR Atlantic306 (talk) 21:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. WP:NACTOR sets an unfortunately low bar, and a Google search does turn up a couple independent sources, even if they aren't reliable. I'd say he's notable enough, even if it's not by much in my opinion. –Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.