Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Bahareth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 18:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mohammad Bahareth[edit]
- Mohammad Bahareth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A promotional biography of a non-notable person. There are claims of notability that preclude speedy deletion, and PROD has been tried before, so here we are. None of the claims of notability is referenced and some if it is just insubstantial peacock language. He is an ambassador for an organisation which doesn't have a Wikipedia article and seems unlikely to be notable. He also publishes stuff himself on lulu.com and, well, it seems that's pretty much it apart from having a Twitter ranking. DanielRigal (talk) 18:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Absolutely no reliable sources out there. An Ambassador of The Arab Business Club is nothing special as it is open to anybody and you nominate yourself [1]. Self published books, one android app, maintainer of a Babylon 5 website... there is nothing notable about him. Bgwhite (talk) 00:06, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Purely vanity article. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.