Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Sherif Kamel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Sherif Kamel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources only have fleeting reference to his name. Fails WP:NBASIC rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 17:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 17:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 17:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 17:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's definitely something fishy going on one of the editors of the article is Mohamedkamelerc and it was created by Lotayef, with the reverse happening at Ehab Lotayef, User:Mohamedkamelerc creating it and Lotayef editing it. Making SPI. Lavalizard101 (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

comment Article creator blocked for socking with Mohamedkamelerc. Make of that what you will. Lavalizard101 (talk) 18:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can’t see any basis for notability. Mccapra (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Article fails WP:NBASIC, does not meet WP:GNG or any WP:SNG. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 21:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is referenced entirely to primary sources that aren't support for notability, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to be referenced properly to reliable source coverage about him in real media. Note that pursuant to Lavalizard's comments above, I've also initiated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehab Lotayef. Bearcat (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from reliable independent sources to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No RS or in-depth coverage to meet GNG or any other measure of notability. --Kbabej (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.