Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Omar (Journalist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 08:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Omar (Journalist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unotable person who basically is just a "hey I have my website" Wgolf (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've updated the page with a lot of relevant sources. Please check it again and let me know :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnAfifi (talk • contribs) 02:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability. APK whisper in my ear 20:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the provided references do not represent significant coverage in reliable sources, which does not seem to exist. The Arabic article about him doesn't provide any useful sources either. Huon (talk) 02:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I have checked the updated references, and they do not establish notability. Huon (talk) 21:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- non-notable. --L235 (talk) As a courtesy, please ping me when replying. 02:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = relevant sources are not the same as reliable sources, of which this article lacks entirely, Bearian (talk) 02:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.