Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moein Z

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Very vague rationale (non-admin closure) NemesisAT (talk) 15:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moein Z

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. Fatemi ♪ 11:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't think I've ever seen a briefer deletion rationale in an AFD. Fatemi, please say more why you believe this article should be deleted and how notability factors into it. It would help if you include a policy-based rationale. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No valid deletion rationale given. There are numerous references as well that could easily establish WP:N, but there's no point in going into an analysis when the nominator was unwilling to give more than a one-word BS rationale for deletion. Jacona (talk) 11:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 20:01, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Oaktree b (talk) 20:04, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lean keep. I haven't done a deep dive into the Persian sources, but they seem to involve some small degree of in-depth coverage and context for the subject's career and background. It looks like a borderline case, but I think over the line. And as the nomination does not offer a more particularized and specific argument for why the sourcing is inadequate, my read is that it is collectively up to snuff, if far from amazing in quality. The article does need some cleaup, however: for a starters, any non-English script needs to be removed from the tables and other inline content. SnowRise ^{let's rap} 00:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.