Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moe Scharff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moe Scharff[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced biography. The only source that I could find was this. Fails WP:BASIC. - Mr X 01:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete searches turned up a handful [1] of sources [2] giving more or less the same info now on the page, in the context of what seems to be postulated atomic warfare in outer space. The best info I found about him was in page searches of "Project Orion: The True Story of the Atomic Spaceship" on books google, according to which He was a physicist who left Livermore as part of a group of physicists then forming a new corporation, and, as of the book's pub. date, he was working for Science Applicatons International Corporation (SAIC)E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as my searches found nothing good aside from minor coverage at Books, browser and Scholar. SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is a Danish physicist M. Scharff (died before 1961) with citation counts 1539, 1451, 565, etc. in Google scholar, which would be a pass of WP:PROF#C1. But I'm pretty sure it's a different person than the subject, because of the different national affiliation. Other than that I see no evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.