Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modular smartphone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Biblioworm 01:18, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Modular smartphone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Message copied from my user talk page (Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)) :-[reply]
- Why was modular smartphone deleted?. It in a bona fides bases include text from another Wikedia article that had copyrighted material. This text was deleted and included another one, after seeing the tag. But was deleted in any case. But copyviolation page continues: Phonebloks. The final text in modular smartphone was right.--Lagoset (talk) 11:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve. It leans a little too heavy towards Blokstore in the opening, but this is an emerging technology with several new players entering the market. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 03:04, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- thanks, I am going to improve. The text from other Wikipedia article has been deleted and new text have been included in this page. --Lagoset (talk) 10:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:09, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep - article shows promise and has shown major improvement since CSD tagging. Looks good for now, though it needs cleanup and maybe some expansion. @Lagoset: I'd recommend drafting in your user sandbox first, since you seem like a good author, and I'd hate to see your contribs CSD'd because you weren't finished. — kikichugirl ^? 06:36, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you a lot. I have improved from the initial redaction. Think are going to appear more news about the topic than can be included in the article or can be included text from Google Project Ara (to do it more lighter) or de-copyrighted from Phonebloks. --Lagoset (talk) 07:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.