Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modo, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 11:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Modo, Inc.[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGCRIT, specifically "...has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." While i would argue that the Inc. Magazine article qualifies, i see no other coverage that would satisfy the 'multiple' part of 'multiple reliable secondary sources'.

An, admittedly, not too thorough google search yields little of note. If anyone more versed in google wants to try, go for it.

Additionally, nothing links here and in the 11 years since its creation, this article has not appreciably improved. Bonewah (talk) 14:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The thorough Inc. magazine article positions the firm as prominent in their field and could certainly count towards notability. There was also an article entitled "Modo moves medicines" which appears to be accessible now only as a lesson in a language tutorial book: [1]. But I'd really like to see more coverage if WP:NCORP is to be demonstrated. AllyD (talk) 08:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: While the (two) references appear to be robust, the second one appears to be more advertorial in nature. Search shows they have taken out patents, and there is all this Spanish search results which don't really refer to them. As above, more coverage is needed to satisfy notability. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see how this company meets notability requirements. --Kbabej (talk) 02:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.