Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mod7
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant 01:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
notability not established - CobaltBlueTony 16:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep due to significant awards and press coverage. Computer Arts magazine, for example, is a pretty good source. Notability established. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mangojuicetalk 18:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep boderline, but notable Tom Harrison Talk 20:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Looks notable enough. AmitDeshwar 21:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Andrew Lenahan. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.