Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobius (beer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 22:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mobius (beer)

Unremarkable Product. Only exists in 2 states in the US, and no references are presented. Delete Dengero (talk) 09:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Appropriate section of beers of the world. Good to include but clearly not as independent article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete The brand of beer is not notable enough for inclusion. I think even a redirect is also giving it more credence than it appears to warrant. If a specific example of the redirect intended for use were given, it could change my mind. Jason Quinn (talk) 21:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:49, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep per http://www.charleston.net/news/2007/aug/25/booze_infused_caffeine_blasted13977/ Other sources are likely to exist. This seems to be an individualy notable caffeinated beer. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the subject fails WP:N as it refers to a beer available in a very limited area and also a beer type which is of a small subset or style. Geoff ^T ^C 17:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep source supplied by Martijn Hoekstra seems to be a minimally acceptable source. [1] looks slightly better. Multiple, independent, secondary. I'm good. Hobit (talk) 21:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above comment by Hobit. -- MISTER ALCOHOL ^T ^C 04:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.