Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobispine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 06:12, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mobispine[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NCORP. Sending to AfD as article has previously been de-PRODed. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding source check for post-2011 company name. AllyD (talk) 11:42, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: The 2006 Prod and deletion were well-founded: the version then and subsequently lacked the WP:RS sources needed to demonstrate notability, whether as a company or a product. Under the original company name, my searches are finding nothing better than routine acquisition announcements and passing mentions. Results are even more sparse for the company name from 2012 onward: routine listings are a long way short of meeting WP:NCORP requirements. AllyD (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom for failing WP:NCORP. There's no claim to notability in the article. Ifnord (talk) 05:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.