Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile Forces Source
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:28, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Mobile Forces Source (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable game in development, fails WP:GNG and WP:CRYSTAL. ukexpat (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete was just about to nom it myself, per the above, has twice been turned into a redirect, only to be re-established by page creator, this is a bunch of "enthusiasts" and the game will be just a user-mod of the original Mobile Forces, highly unlikely to achieve any notability even when released. CaptainScreebo Parley! 13:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Redirect to Mobile Forces Yasht101 14:18, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Mobile Forces --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:11, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment sorry, but what has redirect got to do with it? The game was called "Mobile Forces", the creator of this article maintains that this has nothing to do with the original game so who would search for "Mobile Forces Source" and expect to find the MF article. Just delete as self-promo, internet plundering, wiki-resource eating etc. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:18, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You could've put that across more politely. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, do my comments sound harsh? They are not intended to be, AfDs aren't just for voting, people are expected to qualify their vote, you give no reason for a redirect, that's all, and I can't see that it makes a lot of sense. Cordially CaptainScreebo Parley! 11:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No issues. I specified redirect because the first impression one gets is that this and that are the same. I too was under the same impression till you told me so. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, do my comments sound harsh? They are not intended to be, AfDs aren't just for voting, people are expected to qualify their vote, you give no reason for a redirect, that's all, and I can't see that it makes a lot of sense. Cordially CaptainScreebo Parley! 11:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You could've put that across more politely. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment sorry, but what has redirect got to do with it? The game was called "Mobile Forces", the creator of this article maintains that this has nothing to do with the original game so who would search for "Mobile Forces Source" and expect to find the MF article. Just delete as self-promo, internet plundering, wiki-resource eating etc. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:18, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Whatever the oucome is, I clearly oppose a redirection, as it had nothing to do with the intended targets discussed above. Salvidrim! 00:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
You little brats killed my Wikipedia Page ;( All i wanted was a fucking page XD 21:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)