Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moamel Ahmed Shakeer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 23:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moamel Ahmed Shakeer[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established Amigao (talk) 00:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Iraq. Shellwood (talk) 08:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Article created Find many articles about the person and search results in the last 6 years There are many articles similar to it Muamalq (talk) 01:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree to delete it because there are many similar articles on Wikipedia, but this article contains more sources

Example :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Elnouby Muamalq (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SPEEDY DELETE per nom. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I added English language resources Muamalq (talk) 14:06, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The rationale given twice by Muamalq (talk · contribs) is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but the other !vote is uninformative. Notability is based on the existence of reliable, secondary sources, which need not be in English. Some of the existing sources in the article, such as Ref. 10 and Ref. 33, likely do prove notability. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Untrusted references can be deleted, and only known sources remain.

Put it as a seed Muamalq (talk) 14:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems Legit. Some sources can be modified Mohamedadilkhaled (talk) 01:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The only reasonable viewpoint to establish a consensus is from LaundryPizza03. More input from established editors is needed. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. A huge number of Arabic sources are presented and they link back to a single statement put out by the Iraqi Digital Media Center about a Facebook award for discovering a vulnerability. I don't have time to check every single source, but they have the same date range and the sample of about 10 I dipped into were all one and the same thing - even those outside the date range. The article, additionally, does not make any credible assertion of notability. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree with User:LaundryPizza03 who has identified two good sources. A search for his name in arabic also brings up the the following:

https://www.alarabiya.net/technology/2021/08/21/%D8%A7%D9%83%D8%AA%D8%B4%D9%81-%D8%AB%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%85%D9%88%D9%82%D8%B9%D9%87%D8%A7-%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%B3%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%83-%D8%AA%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%A6-%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%8B-%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%8B- Summary: Facebook gave him $4,000 for finding security bug in their platform, he was one of 129 that they rewarded in 2021 for compatible efforts. He also received several similar rewards from them in the past
https://www.mobtada.com/sciences/1078943/%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%88%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%89-%D9%8A%D9%83%D8%AA%D8%B4%D9%81-%D8%AB%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%89-%D9%85%D9%88%D9%82%D8%B9-%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%B3%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%83 (similar story)
https://www.azzaman.com/%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%8A-%D9%8A%D9%83%D8%B4%D9%81-%D8%AB%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%B3%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%83/
He's mentioned here for catching a hack of CBS news https://al-ain.com/article/iraq-ukraine-abuse-hackers-hack, he's quoted a lot in this one

There's plenty more. Just copy his name in Arabic from the article, google it, filter to news. He's obvioulsy notable in Iraqi/Arabic-language media. CT55555 (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The CBS piece is a press release from the Iraqi Digital Media Center, the other sources cited are press releases from the Center. The Center's 'Cybersecurity Official' is... have you guessed yet? Moamel Ahmed Shakeer. In fact, every one of these sources is derived - including those found IGF by LaundryPizza03 - from a press release from the 'Center'. Anyone smelling coffee? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:30, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.