Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mk Ultra
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus whether sourcing is sufficient, but nor is there consensus to delete. Star Mississippi 02:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Mk Ultra[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mk Ultra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has been tagged for lacking notability since 2011. Mere association with John Vanderslice does not establish notability. Schierbecker (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Schierbecker (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and thank you Schierbecker for giving attention to taking out old trash. BD2412 T 05:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Currently available online sources: The existing SF Weekly article, Trouserpress, allmusic, allmusic. Not too bad for a 90s band. At the very least merge to John Vanderslice. No need for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- The Trouserpress article is a profile of Vanderslice that only talks about MK Ultra incidentally. Schierbecker (talk) 04:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:16, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as per The SF article, two AllMusic reviews and the Trouserpress piece has three paragraphs about the band so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.