Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizanur Rahman Azhari (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:G4. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Mizanur Rahman Azhari

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Mizanur Rahman Azhari
• Articles for deletion/Mizanur Rahman Azhari (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Mizanur Rahman Azhari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was deleted 5 times (even one day ago). Now it was created by a sock again. Anyway echoing what User:S. M. Nazmus Sakib says in the previous nomination: The article is full of references from unreliable sources, youtube link of his waz (religious lecture) and very few routine coverage from reliable sources. The article fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG.

If i compare last afd version with current version, i see almost identical (even inferion) content and references. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 14:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete: Again same material. No additional reliable sources to reconsider the article on new merits. Also make the page inaccessible for recreation except with explicit prior administration approval. werldwayd (talk) 15:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

• Delete - definitely fails WP:GNG. It is frustrating that this page keeps being recreated. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.