Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mixxx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cerejota (talk) 05:17, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mixxx

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The prod was contested by an IP. Non-notable software. Joe Chill (talk) 11:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's a well known open source DJing application: covered on OMGUbuntu (and again), PC Advisor, Best Buy UK website, and there was a paper at New Interfaces for Musical Expression in 2003. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Mixxx is virtually ubiquitous in news articles about Linux audio production, and very widely discussed in articles about free audio software for Windows, and it reaching the #1 download position for free programs (in any category) through the Mac App Store, according to MusicRadar Grayfell (talk) 02:31, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fix well if you want to keep it around, add those independent sources to the article. Blogs are not the most reliable sources, but enough of them (especially ones by professional journalists etc.) would help. W Nowicki (talk) 18:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.