Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mistero
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mistero[edit]
- Mistero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- tagged 4 weeks ago by another editor as not meeting WP:GNG and no attempt has been made since to prove notability
- no references have been provided
- google hits (although mostly in Italian) appear to be only tv blog sites and the Italia1 channel's own website
Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 22:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "No attempt has been made since to prove notability." That sounds like WP:SEP which is not a valid argument. It's just a waste of time. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 02:35, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Defence of reason for deletion As I have stated in the 3rd point, I had performed a google search on the subject in an attempt to find journalistic references for the article. Another editor flagged the page as not meeting WP:GNG, so I believe it is entirely valid to expect the article creator within 4 weeks to offer a reputable secondary source to demonstrate the notability of his/her article. Kindly don't accuse me of wasting time by listing an article for deletion when the previous editor had made it WP:SEP by tagging it for notability and then doing nothing about it - I have done 4 things about it; checking the article history, checking the content against WP policy, doing a google search for sources, and listing this here so that others have an opportunity to comment on its notability. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 22:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It's a very low quality Italian TV show aired on Italia 1 but lacks notability outside Italy (and even inside Italy too, IMHO); as an article should belong to the Italian Wikipedia (see [1]) and not here on en.wiki. It's not worth keeping. Toffanin (talk) 17:40, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- on a side note, these articles should be delete too as they are part of the Mistero show: Le teorie di Adam Kadmon, Adam Kadmon (character). Toffanin (talk) 17:51, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 00:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 09:28, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.