Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mist Survival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mist Survival[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find video game sources: "Mist Survival" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Contested PROD. Non-notable video game failing WP:NGAME due to a lack of significant commentary about the game. The published sources about this game consist of things like this top 10 list in a magazine, rather than the "critical and detailed" commentary required.

There may be a potential for an article about this game in the future, based on the volume of user reviews and its current "early access" status, but this appears to be WP:TOOSOON to me. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 01:13, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a clear delete as lacking notability. --Izno (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. Obvious COI and self-promotion from the article creator. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:56, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Newly released game with little or no independent coverage in reliable sources, created by an undisclosed CoI creator. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Covered/reviewed by quite a few Thai gaming websites.[1][2][3][4][5] Not sure whether any of them pass as a reliable source. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Probably WP:TOOSOON if it ever gains traction. In any case, this would need a WP:NUKE. The extra sources found don't look reliable, rather your run-of-the-mill gaming blogs. The Thai reviews appear to exist solely because the developer is Thai. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:20, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNGand WP:NGAME. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources , created by an undisclosed CoI creator invokes suspicion of promoting the newly developed game.Vinodbasker (talk) 04:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Created by the same editor as created Rati Wattanakornprasit, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rati Wattanakornprasit. Narky Blert (talk) 12:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The edit summary in this diff tells its own story. Narky Blert (talk) 12:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails both WP:GNG and WP:NGAME. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 06:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.