Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missions (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, something someone made up in school one day, and as such, original research (as verified by the comments on this afd page) and unverifiable from reliable sources. - Bobet 11:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Missions (game)

Looks like something someone just made up and is trying to promote. Has no source or links and a common name so does not meet WP:V. -Nv8200p talk 19:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete It seems like almost a joke article. TJ Spyke 20:16, 27 September 2006 (UTCI
• Keep Hey, I helped to create the website and here's what I have to say. it's not a joke; it's something that I love to do. Because of it's emerging position as an activity where I live, I decided to chronicle it on Wikipedia. It's not self-promotion; it's just an activity that's been part fo the community of kids for 5+ years. It also could be considered an offshoot of parkour, which is a very valid sport. Thanks.
• Keep I live in Wisconsin and play missions. Some Minneapolis kids made this page, albeit not very well, judging by the fact that people thought it was a joke, but it should be included on Wikipedia with a little editing.

We have two unsigned comments here and no reliable media coverage to meet WP:V -Nv8200p talk

• Delete - No sources, near impossible to Google. Does not seem legitimate in the least. Wickethewok 18:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Perhaps link it to a parkour site if necessary but the article itself is impressive and I see no reason that simply because something is obscure doesn't mean it has no value here; Wikipedia allows people to get knowledge in ways they never could before and if it out does Google regarding that then I say more power to it. As far as it being sourceless this IS the source. If these kids created it then they are THE authorities on the matter.

Then I think that makes it original research or vanity or both. Another reason(s) to delete -Nv8200p talk 02:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I 100% agree with the above

Two more unsigned comments. Hmmm -Nv8200p talk

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.