Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missionary Society of Saint Thomas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. adequate consensus after 2nd relisting DGG ( talk ) 03:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Missionary Society of Saint Thomas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability asserted. Sources are all primary and inaccessible to general readers. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a major missionary organisation, offline references are allowed as well as the web Atlantic306 (talk) 18:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 20:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 20:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the probably only congregation of an entire Eastern Catholic rite, which gave it three bishops; I've added a major Catholic reference site's page and some more data from it Curopalates (talk) 07:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Its a well known Religious order in India. The article should be given time to improve and add references. ~~ ScitDei^{Wanna talk?} 04:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The page fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. A search on Google found out only passing references. Hagennos (talk) 06:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 06:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this religious order is large enough to be notable, and the fact that it has produced three bishops is a significant sign of it's impact within a Eastern Catholic sui iuris Church. WP:NPOSSIBLE applies here, as it is obvious to anyone who is remotely familiar with the subject area that the sourcing would exist here if we had access to it. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.