Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missionaries to the Unborn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:57, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Missionaries to the Unborn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially a one-note defunct advocacy group that was mildly newsworthy for losing a lawsuit in state court. I searched the usual Google suspects as well as Newspapers.com and found a smattering of mostly contemporary reporting about the lawsuit, with nothing about it since the suit ended in 2001 - so it's clear the suit had no WP:LASTING effects. There was one book source published in 2008 that mentioned the group sporadically in conjunction with other similar groups ([1]), but I wouldn't call it in-depth coverage.

Any other appearances I've found have been mentions of them in quotes, on the lines of "John Smith of Missionaries to the Unborn said XYV."

I don't think it's enough to maintain an article, and it's not suitable for a merge to Anti-abortion violence (no direct violence) or United States anti-abortion movement (would be WP:UNDUE in a broad-coverage article like that). ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:06, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:24, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:24, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. John M Wolfson (talk) 04:06, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as has unsufficient coverage in reliable sources. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 10:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficient amount of content for merging. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 07:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.