Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Universe 2014

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 16:32, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe 2014[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violates WP:CRYSTAL, far too soon, no sources, fails WP:GNG Mediran ^{talk to me!} 08:23, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not only WP:CRYSTAL but not very useful either. Eeekster (talk) 08:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 21:39, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:43, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete far too early for this article, plus WP:CRYSTAL concerns noted above. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 03:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - without enough reliable sources, it's just too soon to have an article about this one. Should probably be recreated in 2014 or 2013 at the earliest, but not now. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:23, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.