Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational 2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:44, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Supranational 2016[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A new annual/year event for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational (2nd nomination). Technically not WP:G4 since this article was not part of the discussion, but it sure falls within the spirit. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete an annual of a quite nonnotable pageant. Staszek Lem (talk) 15:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable enough to justify articles on competitions for each year.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The main article was deleted. As stated by editor Arielle Leira in previous Miss Supranational AfD, "the pageant is not notable as per WP:GNG. WP:WHYN states article requires "significant coverage" in reliable sources (that provide critical analysis of the event). Routine news coverage such as press releases, public announcements, sports coverage, and tabloid journalism is not significant coverage."--Richie Campbell (talk) 13:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- non notable event. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, and no useable sources found, wondered why there is no 'Miss Supranational' wikiarticle, there was, but as can be seen here, there was initially no consensus, and then it was deleted (as was some other articles related to it), deemed non-notable due to lack of sources, checked the Polish wiki to see if it has an article, it does (hooray!), but only has one reference to a press release about a mr supranational competition (boo), so doesn't look good either.Coolabahapple (talk) 05:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.