Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Sunuwar Nepal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Sunuwar Nepal[edit]

Miss Sunuwar Nepal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable event. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Way too soon. While a "national beauty pageant of Nepal" would certainly be notable in theory - this event was only created in 2015. WAY too soon. The event needs to prove itself over a period of sufficient time and generate enough interest in third-party reliable sources to show that it is notable. For now, delete, and let's look again in a few years' time if it's still going. Mabalu (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 17:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Lacks evidence of notability from independent, reliable sources. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.