Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Junk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Junk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The first two references are to articles that are substantially similar, e.g. containing the same quotes from the company representative suggesting that they were based on PR materials, contrary to WP:ORGIND. Creating this article was Ayokonasir's only contribution to Wikipedia, suggestive of a WP:PROMO SPA account. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The page is a great ad and is obviously not maintained. (I wonder how many mirror sites are carrying it.)--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 22:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.