Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Grand International results

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Grand International results[edit]

I think it is better to include Miss Grand International in the 3rd-tier section of the article List of beauty contests instead of deleting this article.--RenRen070193 07:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RenRen070193 (talk • contribs)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Content fork of Miss Grand International with extra red links The Banner talk 19:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The notability of the blue links also looks suspect to me, as does the notability of the Miss Grand International contest itself. – Margin1522 (talk) 00:34, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Delete Either merge this into Miss_Grand_International or delete both. I already read the article on deletion of the previous article, and I suggest you just let someone else nom' it for deletion Banner. Gimme a couple hours and ill nom it myself if I don't think its notable. Jcmcc450 (talk) 21:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.