Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirriam Macwilliams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mirriam Macwilliams[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find any independent sources fails WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 10:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:16, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete insufficient sources to pass GNG. Wikipedia is not Linkedin.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 12:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. Bythebooklibrary (talk) 02:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.