Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirka Vasiljević
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mirka Vasiljević (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
She is famous because of relationship with her parthner. Apart from that what is her independet notablity? For now article is quite poorly sourced. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Fashion, and Serbia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly established notability already established and documented in Wikipedia. This nomination (one of dozens today of notable women associated with professional soccer players by the same contributor) feels malicious MNewnham (talk) 01:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Why not make it a rule that any married woman should be included in her husband's article, rather than have one of her own? I mean, it is impossible for a woman to be notable herself, isn't it?
If I was feeling pointy I would nominate Vujadin Savić for deletion on the basis that he is only notable for having Mirka Vasiljević as a partner. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Why not make it a rule that any married woman should be included in her husband's article, rather than have one of her own? I mean, it is impossible for a woman to be notable herself, isn't it?
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.