Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirjami Heikkinen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 03:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mirjami Heikkinen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable for English Wikipedia. Voice actress dubs into Finnish. The Finnish Wikipedia is just a paragraph like this one plus the credit list, of which only 1/3 of it is sourced and mostly by sources that just mention her in a cast list. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:48, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this currently suggests it is unlikely to better satisfy WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Possible Keep per the several reliable from Finnish publications I was able to find in Google News. While it's hard to tell if a few of them may be passing mentions, I'd suggest some of the sources go into depth about this actor, so I don't think a delete would be the best option here. 和DITOR E tails 00:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dubbing roles such as Kim Possible, and Blossom count as major roles as they are main characters. The major roles combined with EditorE's finding has led me to a Keep (at least for now) opinion. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.