Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mira Beauty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 20:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mira Beauty[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sources doesn't satisfy WP:GNG Pilean (talk) 07:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Pilean (talk) 07:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete paid for spam sourced to non-rs, blatant PR and blackhat SEO. CUPIDICAE💕 12:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spammy PR article. Non-notable. Oaktree b (talk) 16:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article is now improved with many sources. Some of the sources are listed below.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/mira-beauty-raises-9m-unilever-143136981.html

https://wwd.com/beauty-industry-news/beauty-features/digital-download-mira-silicon-valley-beauty-search-engine-1203344476/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/yolarobert1/2019/12/04/meet-mira-the-app-intersecting-beauty-and-artificial-intelligence/

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/mira-google-beauty-world-085523159.html

https://www.morningbrew.com/retail/stories/2020/09/04/celebrities-cant-stop-wont-stop-launching-beauty-brands

https://www.glossy.co/beauty/are-online-reviews-the-way-to-unlock-product-discovery-digitally/

https://verygoodlight.com/2020/08/14/mira-app/

https://www.collegian.psu.edu/asktheexperts/article_bad209d6-e971-11ea-8069-bf43fcf798fd.html

https://wwd.com/beauty-industry-news/beauty-features/coronavirus-salon-workers-beauty-freelancers-job-less-1203544741/

https://www.cew.org/beauty_news/beauty-has-its-own-search-engine-mira/

https://www.beautypackaging.com/contents/view_breaking-news/2019-10-17/first-to-market-beauty-search-engine-debuts/ Piermoire (talk) 06:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree that this is paid-for spam. MER-C 14:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this spam article. - MrOllie (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam. It doesn't help either that other users have been spamming the site link either. Pahunkat (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is WP:NCORP and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short, WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, no echo-chamber faux-news, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.