Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mint Velvet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Mint Velvet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Mint Velvet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP - all that a search returns is social media, store locators, online retail, nothing reliable, significant, or independent. Cabayi (talk) 19:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 19:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 19:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.