Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Enforcement Division

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Missvain (talk) 01:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Enforcement Division[edit]

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Enforcement Division (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Enforcement Division is not a notable enough topic on its own. It should be merged with the article for its parent organization, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Minnemeeples (talk) 15:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest a redirect to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and caution about what content to actually merge there. Much of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Enforcement Division article is unverified lore, facts that fail verification, and trivial lists of information. Little of the enforcement division article should actually be merged into Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Minnemeeples (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I see no good reason to merge this article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.