Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mini Shaji Thomas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing early per WP:SNOW. Missvain (talk) 18:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mini Shaji Thomas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of Notability. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACADEMIC GermanKity (talk) 07:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 07:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 07:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 07:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per NACADEMIC-6 as the Director of National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli is the highest full time managing post in the institution (there is a chairperson, but he oversees the board and is not full time).[1] Her citation record probably doesn't meet NACADEMIC-1 (depends on sub-field assessment), but isn't far. She also plausibly meets GNG, given that there are 143 hits in google news with her name, but assessing this is difficult as a large number of these are re-hashed press releases by NIT-T which do not confer notability. However it is quite plausible there are some in depth sources within these results.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 08:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets NACADEMIC-6. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per c6. (I am the creator of the article). Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it looks as if I am fated to agree with MST all day... Meets WP:NACADEMIC 6, for sure. And as per that guideline, the institution's own website is fine and dandy as a source. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly passes WP:NACADEMIC! I'm surprised it is being nominated here at AfD. Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 12:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly satisfy point number 6 in WP:NACADEMIC. National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli is clearly a major academic institution, thus passing the bar easily. SunDawn (talk) 09:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly meets WP:NACADEMIC, Myconcern (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Dear GermanKity, please forgive me for putting this as a statement (also, as a request) - kindly refer to WP:AFD guidelines once again because many of them overlap. If you have any doubts, then use the talk page of that page or reach out to seasoned editors via WP:TEA. I'm looking forward to seeing you as a good wiki editor in near future. - Hatchens (talk) 05:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep, Speedy close: While the references per se are not of the first quality, Thomas meets our inclusion criteria, passing WP:NACADEMIC. We require better referencing, not deletion Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 06:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this passes WP:NACADEMIC. Powerful Karma (talk) 07:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.