Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mines are mine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mines are mine[edit]
- Mines are mine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, unknown subject (as only search result seems to be a couple of one minute YouTube clips), OR, essay.
I think that about covers the main points, it seems to be an essay with some strange links and full of OR without recourse to a particular subject apart from anger at mines and their ecological consequences. Chaosdruid (talk) 22:21, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article's infobox suggests that it is about a film, but the main text doesn't specifically state that. Furthermore, the film is not listed in the Internet Movie Database, which calls its notability into question. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yes, a poorly writen article whose text recounts the events leading to why the film ws made. The expose' film Mines are Mine,[1] dealing with mining practices in Goa, screened at the 6th annual Vibgyor Filme Festival in Kerala last January: #70 on this screening list. However, it did not win awards, nor get critical commentary and review. Fails WP:NF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:42, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.